On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 04:27:42PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Tomasz Wegrzanowski schrieb folgendes am Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 03:33:14PM 
> +0200:
> > People are not very sure if it would be better to keep Mach with some
> > changes (liku : modules support), take some better microkernel (is there 
> > any ?),
> 
> Maybe L4 from the GMD or its free variant Fiasco, see 
> http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/fiasco/.

I've been at this site, and it sounds interesting. This seems to be a
well-organized code, and mach seems not to be. But changing the
microkernel would mean rewriting a lot of source code, isn't it ?
Bye!

> 
> Cheers,
> -- 
> Stefan Karrmann
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to