On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 04:27:42PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Tomasz Wegrzanowski schrieb folgendes am Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 03:33:14PM > +0200: > > People are not very sure if it would be better to keep Mach with some > > changes (liku : modules support), take some better microkernel (is there > > any ?), > > Maybe L4 from the GMD or its free variant Fiasco, see > http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/fiasco/.
I've been at this site, and it sounds interesting. This seems to be a well-organized code, and mach seems not to be. But changing the microkernel would mean rewriting a lot of source code, isn't it ? Bye! > > Cheers, > -- > Stefan Karrmann > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]