On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 03:42:55AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hate do write this mail, because I have to discourage someone who actually
> sat down and made some code!
Not so much yet, I just started looking at it yesterday morning.
>
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 06:24:49PM -0700, Steve Bowman wrote:
> > Well, I'm not sure about volunteering to take the lead on this, but I
> > have started working on it. It's going to take awhile so be patient.
> > I may come back to the list a few times for questions/guidance.
>
> Maybe it gets faster when we cooperate, and settle on a common approach.
>
> > So far, I've got the ppp network interface device mostly wired into
> > gnumach (slip, too). I've got a few critical pieces ifdef'd out so I
> > can see if I've got the build flags and dependencies mostly worked out
> > which I do. The resulting kernel boots. I'll have to look more at the
> > critical pieces to see what's needed to make them work. The pieces
> > already done are mostly just scavenged from linux[1]. The critical
> > pieces ifdef'd out need to be wired into mach/hurd and have to do with
> > process management and ttys.
>
> That's why this approach doesn't work. I spend a couple of hours in the
> various PPP codes available, and decided that this will not lead to
> something. You could also put this code in pfinet, btw.
>
> The problem is that the linux kernel module relies on the line discipline to
> talk to the modem. We simply don't have this. (And my efforts to port this
> can be seen in the contrib/marcus/gnumach-char directory on
> alpha.gnu.org/gnu/hurd. In other words, I couldn't get it to work).
Exactly what I found out - the line discipline stuff. I didn't know if
I was missing something or what, now I know it's not worth the effort
to go down this path.
>
> > All of this is just the first step, there's still the porting of the
> > ppp daemon itself which I've also started[2], then stopped pending
> > gnumach support.
>
> I think that we agreed on using the BSD ppp user space implementation (or
> better, a port of). Roland suggested mpd, but it uses netgraph, about which
> I know nothing.
I missed those discussions.
>
> > [2] started with ppp 2.4.0f before I started working on gnumach.
> > The linux code put into gnumach looks like about vintage 2.3.7 IIRC so
> > I'm going to restart this with the 2.3.11 ppp source available in potato.
> > Most of the work will be writing a pppd/sys-gnu.c file. I have no idea
> > how much of sys-linux.c can be used.
>
> That's the other side of the story. sys-gnu.c and the work in gnumach will
> be needed in addition to the almost impossible gnumach work you mentioned.
> But something like sys-gnu (actually less) is needed for ppp, so with this
> in mind you have the idea why user space ppp is much less work.
>
> This was all discussed awhile ago on this list in various threads, and
> several people made summaries.
Whenabouts in the archive should I look?
Steve
--
Steve Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (preferred)
Buckeye, AZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://www.goodnet.com/~sbowman/>
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux and GNU/Hurd <http://www.debian.org>
