On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 11:30:40AM -0600, Daniel E Baumann wrote: > Hi, I am currently hacking around the routing stuff in PPP by just allowing > you to do "add default HISADDR", which makes the peer at the other end the > gateway and no other routing entries can be made or removed (at least not > until there is sufficient support in libc0.2). I am attempting to use > file_name_lookup and then fsys_set_options to do this. When I supply the node > name is it safe to hard code "/servers/socket/2" as the node name? Can > pfinet be set to a different node and operate properly? I just want to know > if I should make this more flexible and not just assume the pfinet is set on > this node? As far as I know it is always set on "/servers/socket/2", but if > anyone has any info to dispute this please let me know otherwise I am going > to do file_name_lookup on "/servers/socket/2". I think I may add a check to > ensure that it is a tunnel interface also.
If I remember correctly, 2 is there because the value of the PF_INET macro is 2. If you want more modularity you might watn to do something like this: sprintf(file_name, "/servers/socker/%d", PF_INET); Igor