Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Use of ldconfig is not portable. We should not encourage maintainers into > Linux specific programming.
Ok. This, and especially that libtool can do them, has convinced me. > That's an idea. Can you submit it as a bug report against libc0.2 (or > whatever contains ldconfig now)? I've expanded the script a bit, so that "ldconfig -X" and the like still silently succeeds, and put in a --help message discussing the issues. Could you review it (in bug#95189), particularly the explanation? I don't want to spread pseudoauthorative falsehoods. -- Robbe
signature.ng
Description: PGP signature
