On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 07:34:44PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > On 20 May 2002, Damien Genet wrote: > > > Le lun 20/05/2002 ? 01:28, Adam Heath a ?crit : > > > Now, for some other analogies, to existing practices, showing that /hurd > > > is > > > not needed, *at all*. > > [snip] > > > So, why then do we really need /hurd? What are the *real* reasons? > > > > i suggest that you first read what the Hurd and the translator concept > > are : > > http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd-paper.html > > http://www.debian.org/ports/hurd/hurd-doc-translator > > http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd-talk.html > > All well and good, but that doesn't answer the question. Why does hurd need > /hurd?
Why do we need directories? Because it will be big mess without them. We have /hurd for more than 10 years, I haven't heard a single argument why we should remove it. Same goes for /libexec. You don't seem to take the time to learn the Hurd, if you don't do that you can't argue about it. Jeroen Dekkers -- Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GNU supporter - http://www.gnu.org
pgpOIHX8zEcVm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
