"Manuel A." Fernández Montecelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> try "-nolisten TCP" in the script launching X server ;) I'll try to remember that next time a restart the X server (which probably happens when I can upgrade to a released and stable woody...). But my point was that, *by default*, the X server listens to tcp connections from anywhere. (I'm running the Xsun server, so I still have some hope that the default behaviour is better in modern X packages). > i don't understand why AJ (release manager?) is worried about the FW > tools of the Hurd and states that it can't be released yet. I hope there will be a sensible list of release criteria, prepared with input from both the release manager the hurd folks, when Debian GNU/Hurd gets closer to release, and putting FW-tools on that list sounds pretty nonsensical. But I'm happy to postpone that discussion until the list is being prepared and release getting closer. > and must be treated separatedly, begginig for the name. "hurd-i386" is > not a sub-arch of linux. what about "netbsd-{64 archs}"? many internal > Debian procedures have to be change, in order to manage the new > flavours... IIRC, Markus have written a proposal on more flexible arch handling, and I think there is some (slow) progress. /Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]