Fair enough. Really, the point is to know what they did, reuse the good and redo the bad.
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 07:39:03PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > It's only 800 or so lines; it's pretty basic. Basing it off redhat > isn't really necessary. There's also a bit of cruft in the redhat > version. I'd end up stripping out stuff, changing stuff, etc; it would > get to the point where I'd have been better off just starting from > scratch. > > On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 03:53:17PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > If RH already uses /etc/makedev.d, why not start with their > > application? > > > > On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 06:16:04PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > > Looking at redhat's makedev, they have device nodes in /etc/makedev.d, > > > so that packages can simply add files to that directory to create new > > > devices. This is the way debian seems to do things in other cases, and > > > would be a good thing to do, imo. So, I've started rewriting it in C, > > > to have it use /etc/makedev.d. > > -- > Broad surveillance is a mark of bad security. > -- Bruce Schneier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]