On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:37:22PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > We need not change anything now in Hurd systems. We do not need to > worry about matching aspects of policy that we expect to change by > the time we actually release. And, we expect that FHS will have, by > that time, a Hurd-specific annex that covers this particular point.
I didn't really follow the earlier discussions on this - Can you remind me what mailing list it was on? The idea of libexec being in a Hurd annex seems silly (and something a committee would be unlikely to accept if we were storing anything other than Hurd-specific binaries in there), so I'd like to understand more. Tks, Jeff Bailey -- learning from failures is nice in theory... but in practice, it sucks :) - Wolfgang Jaehrling