> Been there, Okuji didn't want to update the entry since "we > haven't made a realse and that the current release (0.2) uses the > serverboot method"; search the bug-grub archives for the > particular thread. I think that the Debian package already uses > the new boot method in the example files.
Isn't 0.3 official? Nope. Isn't this a good reason to release? Nope. Since we would release a version of the Hurd that is unstable (ext2fs foobars file-systems, ftpfs/nfs are buggy like mad, no PPP support, etc). Making a release because "people think that the Hurd isn't in development" is a bad reason, they can take a peek at the CVS to see if any development is going on.