Otavio Salvador a écrit : > Hello Luca, > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Luca Favatella<slacky...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 22/06/2009, Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: >>> Hello Luca, >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Luca Favatella<slacky...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> This patch (against d-i trunk) aims to handle libc the same way also >>>> on GNU/kFreeBSD (libc0.1) and GNU/Hurd (libc0.3). >>> You've forgotten the changelog entry ;-) >> Fixed in attached patch. > > Cool, thanks. > > Well now I'm starting to ponder if we ought to commit it right now or > wait until you do more changes and merge it all at once. > > Since we're at beggining of the development cycle I'm more for > commiting it soon so we can discover any introduced bugs (or ugly > non-predicted behaviour) and also leave kfreebsd branch with the > non-ready changes. What others think?
I think so, the kfreebsd branch should be done for development. Once the code is ready, it should probably be committed to trunk. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
