On 16.11.2010 10:42, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:14:09AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 14.11.2010 13:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs
(turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The
rationale is summarized in
http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking. I would like to know
about issues with these changes on some of the Debian ports, and if
we need to disable one of these changes on some port.
--no-add-needed sounds like it'll cause a *lot* of build failures for no
particular gain. I don't think it's a good idea.
I think it is. Besides fixing potential bugs, else you'll never be able
to use gold as the linker. See the already filed bug reports.
This change is one I can agree with on technical grounds, though it
will cause a great deal of pain in the short term. Have we got any
estimates on exactly how much breakage will result before the change
gets made?
see http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking#Furtherinformation
referenced in the first email of this thread.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ce2c7c5.5040...@debian.org
