Svante Signell, le Thu 17 Mar 2011 19:43:09 +0100, a écrit : > On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 19:02 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > [email protected], le Thu 17 Mar 2011 18:12:40 +0100, a écrit : > > > Perhaps we could put some of these packages on debian-ports? > > > > Well, let's try to simply have them fixed in Debian itself first :) > > Even if the binary packages are removed from GNU/Hurd is it still > possible to port them?
No, I'm saying that we can drop them from the list of packages to be removed, and work on fixing them. > It will probably take some time to see why they > don't build and if they are usable in Hurd or not. They used to be, so it should not be too hard. > More generally, is there a priority list of the FTBFS packages that > need to be ported? As referenced on the Debian hurd port website, and in the #hurd topic. > BTW: Looks like the files failed_packages.txt.gz is not updated since > February 12. Can this be updated a little more frequently? Damn, my Makefile rule was bogus indeed. Now fixed, updated, and will be again everyday like the dep graph. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
