On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 20:34 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:

> That being said, the question indeed holds.
> define_shlibpath_overrides_runpath4hurd.patch and
> disable_cmdline_wrap4hurd.patch do still apply fine, and I don't see why
> they shouldn't be applied.
> 
> The deplibs-ident2.patch patch however touches non-GNU things, Svante,
> could you fix it?

Yes I'll try to fix the deplibs-ident2.patch for 2.4 when time permits.

> > Youpi, can we host this package on debian-ports?
> 
> We already do.

Since the patches are tested for 2.2.10 why not install that version at
debian-ports, until the patches works for 2.4. Current version at
debian-ports seems to be: 2.2.6b-2 





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1301868955.3743.19.camel@x60

Reply via email to