* Svante Signell wrote on Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 08:20:55PM CEST: > On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 20:06 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > --- libtool-2.4/tests/cmdline_wrap.at.orig 2010-05-20 > > > 23:18:41.000000000 +0200 > > > +++ libtool-2.4/tests/cmdline_wrap.at 2011-02-06 11:08:29.000000000 > > > +0100 > > > @@ -30,6 +30,9 @@
> > > +# Setting low max_cmd_len on "hurd-386" does not make sense" > > > +AT_CHECK([if test "$host_os" == "gnu" ; then exit 77; fi]) > > > > Please use = not ==, the former is Posix test, the latter bash-specific. > > OK, do you want me to send an update? I can't speak for Kurt, I only help maintain upstream. ;-) > > Does this test actually fail on hurd-i386, or is this just because you > > consider it wasted time? In the former case, please send the patch > > upstream but also show a cut-n-paste of the failing test log. > > Yes, this test fails without the patch. I'll build an unpatched version > and submit the failing test log. BTW: Where is upstream, is > [email protected] sufficient? Sure, but you can just as well send a patch right to libtool-patches (first-post moderation, but subscribing is not required). Thanks, Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
