Aníbal Monsalve Salazar, le Mon 29 Aug 2011 22:10:25 +1000, a écrit : > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:01:12AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >Thomas Schmitt, le Sat 27 Aug 2011 21:54:31 +0200, a écrit : > >>This idea must come from libacl-dev. > >>And really in > >> /lib/libacl.la > >>i read > >> dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libattr.la' > > > >Yes, that's the problem: it should rather be a -lattr, because > >libattr.la is not shipped any more. That would be fixed by a newer build > >of the acl package, but unfortunately it FTBFS ATM (PATH_MAX, #636512). > > You suggest to reintroduce .la files for acl and attr and use -lattr in > dependency_libs of /lib/libacl.la after fixing #636512, right?
Not at all. I'm suggesting simply fixing the acl FTBFS, since it should solve the whole issue. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110829123453.GB3244@type