On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:22:14AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 16:18 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > From the one of the porters side, this would be a _very_ good solution > > indeed! If GNU/Hurd enters som kind of testing status, the number of > > users and contributors will increase (hopefully). Can it be part of > > testing and then when the release happens, be treated specially? And > > most packages will be located in the main repo, only the packages having > > patches, not yet handled by the DMs, being there. Is that possible? > > > > BTW: Are builds reported to buildd.debian.org already, it is > > visible ate least in the table on https://buildd.debian.org/, or maybe > > Samuel meant something else > > In my world it is considered polite to answer questions asked. Even if > you don't have the time to reply properly, just say so. I'm still > waiting for some kind of feedback, especially the questions. > > I assume this is not a regular mail correspondence, is it? >
I generally consider it polite to give people an opportunity to respond before assuming that you're being ignored, especially if it's part of a longer thread. As per my previous mail, I will not be adding hurd to testing for this release. It would affect the release as a whole, and I'm not happy doing that. Neil -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120604095624.gu5...@camblue.cbg.collabora.co.uk