On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I'm not going to go through building this on a kfreebsd porterbox to try > and figure out how isc-dhcp would look if rebuilt against such packages, > but that looks a saner base for porters to build upon. > > That doesn't make the timing issues I've mentioned disappear though. I'm > OK with thinking about it again if porters endorse/welcome/successfully > test the resulting packages and installation images.
Thanks for the feedback. Would it be ok to stage the changes in unstable to make it somewhat easy for porters to test? Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mpb5cgpq1oe6d_vpsoggyk6o3y2bqrrxwba_ozlh6m...@mail.gmail.com