Christoph Egger wrote: > It means we need a stable release of some sort to keep DSA provided > hardware. That's currently buildds and porterboxes.
That's annoying. To provide stable/security support ourselves, it seemed we'd need an unofficial repo, and that doesn't sound like something DSA could use. Although, how is that handled for hurd-i386? I assume it has no security support, there may be some unofficial packages used; are therefore none of their machines DSA? Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141111120505.gd14...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org
