* Mark Hindley <m...@hindley.org.uk>: > On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 06:06:41PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > Please note that the start target refers to a non-existing > > /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/85-hwclock.rules. The correct file is > > /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/hwclock.rules instead. That file contains a > > reference to rtc0 that probably needs fixing for Hurd as well. > > Hmmm, udev is linux only, so I imagine udev rules are cruft on Hurd.
That would be my understanding as well. However on linux, the file should be named 85-hwclock.rules again. Maybe this could be fixed too? For hurd (and maybe linux), the big question remains, _if_ updating the hwclock should be done by hwclock.sh by default. I don't know the answer to this design question for hurd, or for linux-with-sysvinit systems. Chris
