Michael Kelly, le dim. 08 juin 2025 08:35:02 +0100, a ecrit: > On 07/06/2025 21:47, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > There is one thing, however: I see in some places going through shadows > > that they lock the next object before unlocking the previous. This > > indeed seems safer against object->shadow changing under our feet. > That is my mistake and you are correct. See the revised patch at the end of > this message which addresses that. I've kept the code in the same style as > the existing code of vm_object.c (ie. use of while(1)/break).
I have fixed it and applied it, thanks! Samuel
