On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 17:13 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > In that case, it doesn't matter as nearly all translations are indeed > outdated because even the current version was providing an outdated POT > file. > > So, even for language who will not be able to complete their cycle and > update the file, the debconf templates will not be less translated with > the second NMU than the first one.
Right, that's clear. So this is just a special case and it's not generally recommended to be refactoring debconf templates at this point. Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
