Christian PERRIER píše v Čt 01. 07. 2010 v 07:15 +0200: > Quoting Michal Simunek ([email protected]): > > #. Type: boolean > > #. Description > > #. Type: boolean > > #. Description > > #: ../openvas-plugins-dfsg.templates:1001 > > #: ../openvas-plugins-dfsg.templates:2001 > > msgid "" > > "The package can remove it now or you can select to remove it later on " > > "manually." > > > > Further to boolean type, I thing better is: > > > > "The package installation can remove it now or you can remove it later " > > "manually." > > > > Because you can select Yes or No, not Remove it now or Remove it later > > manually. > > While improving debconf templates is always welcomed, I'm very > reluctant to do this at the moment I'm proposing a simple NMU to deal > with pending translation work. > > The formal review process is another process (that takes quite a long > time) and mixing it with the simple NMu process is likely to lead to > bad results. > > I'd suggest sending a but report with patch (against the original > templates, preferrably) including a mention that a translation update > round is needed if the templates change happens. > >
OK, done. Bugreport 587782 -- Michal Šimůnek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
