Gerfried Fuchs píše v Po 16. 08. 2010 v 13:22 +0200: > Hi! > > * Michal Simunek <[email protected]> [2010-08-16 13:12:51 CEST]: > > Gerfried Fuchs píše v Po 16. 08. 2010 v 12:22 +0200: > > > I don't deem a new update round needed, I didn't call before and it was > > > explicitly stated that a swift review round is going on so that people > > > should hold their horses until the call is sent out - which I did just > > > now. Do you really consider it necessary to collect all currently > > > submitted translations and do another call just to get the above table > > > correct and have the Czech translation listed in there with fuzzy and > > > untranslated strings? Would that really be that helpful? > > > > Of course not, but to have templates translated and updated yes. > > I don't follow. The template was attached in the original mail of this > thread. You just need to save it and run > "msgmerge --previous cs.po templates.pot > cs.po.new && mv cs.po.new cz.po" > to update your former translated file with the new pot enties. > > For your convenience I did that now, find attached the updated cs.po > file - hope this is what you were looking for. If not please be a bit > more specific. > > > So, I must handle it manual and send a new bugreport with new version of > > cs.po? > > I guess it would best if you send it to the already open bugreport so > it's clear from there that this is the updated version and the other one > shouldn't be used. >
OK, thanks. > Enjoy! > Rhonda -- Michal Šimůnek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
