Hello Justing et al, Am Sun, Jul 05, 2026 at 02:35:14PM -0300 schrieb Santiago Ruano Rincón: > > Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > > > I've just pushed to the announcements repo these two drafts: > > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/publicity-team/announcements/-/blob/master/en/2026/20260708-bookworm-lts-begins.wml?ref_type=heads > > > https://salsa.debian.org/publicity-team/announcements/-/blob/master/en/2026/20260831-bullseye-lts-eol.wml?ref_type=heads > > > > > > to announce the handover of Debian 12 to LTS, and EOL of Debian 11 LTS. > > > > > > Could you please review them? > > > > Okay, inline commented diffs and attached revised versions: > > Thanks! > > > > > > --- 20260708-bookworm-lts-begins.wml.orig 2026-07-05 05:25:44.414207560 > > > +0100 > > > +++ 20260708-bookworm-lts-begins.wml 2026-07-05 06:51:34.412113413 > > > +0100 > > > @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ > > > > > > <p> > > > On 12 June 2026, three years after the initial release, the regular > > > > (I'm standardising to this date format everywhere else, since it's the > > format that styleguides generally recommend.) > > OK, thanks. But, when Debian has started using that date format? I > still see the format that I used in the trixie release information: > ("Debian 13.5 was released on May 16th, 2026. Debian 13.0 was initially > released on August 9th, 2025."). > https://www.debian.org/releases/trixie/ > And used because of that. Any way, I'm happy to accept your change. > > For the future, is there any written guideline about formats (in > general)?
I'm also interested, as I find the previous format "August 9th, 2025"
much nicer to read, but I'm of course not a native speaker and most
likely I will read the German version with its own styles …
Thanks!
Greetings
helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [email protected]
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
