On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, William F. Maton wrote: > > > > CRC.ca is *supposed* to have a mirror on their IPv6 drop but its IPv6 > > > presence doesn't seem to be super stable yet :| > > > > Hooo haaaa! We just upgraded to a newer Cisco IOS, which caused us some > > BGP+ grief. Right now things seem genki (OK). In fact, ftp.ipv6.crc.ca > > is multihomed: > > Hmm > > PING 3FFE:3700:1F00:FC83:0:0:0:2(3ffe:3700:1f00:fc83::2) 56 data bytes > >From 3ffe:3700:1f00:200::2: Destination unreachable: Address unreachable > >From 3ffe:3700:1f00:200::2: Destination unreachable: Address unreachable > >From 3ffe:3700:1f00:200::2: Destination unreachable: Address unreachable > >From 3ffe:3700:1f00:200::2: Destination unreachable: Address unreachable > > The 2001 IP works fine..
Looks like a routing problem somewhere. > > Via CA*Net 3, directly by tunnel to the 6Tap in Chicago and via a tunnel > > to Qwest. So what's the dark lining in this silver cloud? You can't > > Are one of those two groups willing to give permanent tunnels to smaller > organizations like us? Qwest is looking actually make IPv6 tunnel services a commercial offering by the end of the year. 6Tap *may* do it for free though. > > connect via FTP using IPv6! You need to use augustus.dgim.crc.ca for > > that, and I'm running that machine with Solaris 8. The only reason? The > > lack of a reliable port of *any* FTP daemon (with features like wu-ftpd) > > I've been using openbsd ftpd (the linux port) it seems to work well > enough, but I am not doing any serious serving with it. OK. I've got lot's of classes and users on this system....Maybe I'll try it. > > Jason > wfms