>>>>> "Wichert" == Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Wichert> Previously Brian May wrote: >> Are there any downside to the USAGI stuff? ie. has it been >> tested to the point where it is known to work, and not break >> anything else? Wichert> More importantly, what do davem and alexy think of it? I was wondering that, so I posted a message on linux-kernel. So far I have got one irritated response via private E-Mail (paraphrased: can't you get your facts straight? IPv6 servers do work on Linux). I pointed out that he may have misunderstood me, and gave him references to the messages posted in this mailing list. Wichert> This does not work for USAGI, since it means changing the Wichert> existing IPv6 stack that a fair number of people are Wichert> already using. What should happen is that the USAGI Wichert> people hash this out with davem and alexy and come up Wichert> with a strategy for improving the stock kernel. Agreed. Perhaps somebody should mail these people directly? (assuming they don't see my message; even then it might help, as judging from the first response I got other people might be confused too; somebody else might be able to clarify the important issues involved, such as what Wichert said above). -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>