You also have tcpdump running on a terminal in your kitchen, so you
have a lot more issues than PPPoE on your hands... =)
Eric J.
>This assumes that Daniel is using PPPoE or PPPoA. I have a bridged
>solution at home with a /29 so have not had a chance to play with any the
>PPPoE offerings.
>
>S
>
>From a personal preference I'd prefer the tweakability of an internal
>device Jeremy Lunn wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 03:32:08PM -0800, Simon Tennant wrote:
>> > Unless I'm missing something, running the ADSL nic in your firewall
>> > instead of as a seperate ethernet device saves you allocating each a
>> > unique address.
>>
>> Nope, it may save on overhead if it doesn't use PPPoE (but it still
>> might have to use PPPoA). But you don't allocate an IP address to each
>> device, as I said, PPPoE writes to the ethernet interface rawly. Only
>> the PPP device has an IP address and it's more of a pseudo device.
>> --
>> Jeremy Lunn
>> Melbourne, Australia
>>
>> --
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>--
>Simon Tennant, Linuxcare, Inc.
>415.577.6719 tel, 415.701.7457 fax
>pgp id: 6410974D
>Linuxcare. Support for the revolution.
>
>
>--
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
