I think it had to do with Address Book functions. If I remember
correctly PostgreSQL allowed a little better address book functions.
If the system's mostly for folks to read mail while out of the office,
either database would probably be fine.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 02:45:08AM -0500, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Nate Duehr wrote:
>
> > AFAIK, works "better" with PostgreSQL than MySQL -- there's a couple of
> > features that don't with on Potato with a MySQL database that do on
> > Postgres.
>
> I would really appreciate a pointer to which features. Not that I am
> likely to change, as usage is low, and most staff use it only to read
> emails from cyber-cafes while travelling. Just for info.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> --
> Sanjeev "ghane" Gupta Mob: +65 98551208
> dotXtra Pte Ltd Fax: +65 2275776
> Singapore email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
--
Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key available upon request, or at wwwkeys.pgp.net and others.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
