On Tue, 22 May 2001 08:00:01 +0200, Robert Waldner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 22 May 2001 01:26:56 EDT, Chris Wagner writes:
>>We should probably clarify "non-routable" by saying "non-publicly routable".
>
>Well, we could also say RFC1918, couldnīt we ;-?
I prefer to say "site local" which is both almost accurate and terse.
This is not offical terminology, but there is an RFC that calls the
"169.254.0.0/16" "link local", so "site local" seems fine.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Karlsruhe, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
