On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 11:04:01 +1100 (EST), Donovan Baarda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>As a matter of interest, what is the story with all the imap and pop 
>implementations? The debian woody "mailserver" task includes qpopper and uw-
>imapd. What's wrong with the much smaller ipopd, which is uw-imapd's pop 
>counterpart?

This is flame war material.

Generally, I keep my hands off any UW software because the UW people
are not very security aware.

>What are peoples experiences/comments? Are the ssl variants worth using?

I like Courier because it is one very flexible package and it does all
variants that might be needed: pop/imap in both ssl and non-ssl. There
is even an MTA which I have never looked at, though.

As opposed to Cyrus, Courier uses a standard mail spool (in maildir
format) which can be accessed by third-party software for debugging
purposes.

The author of Courier has a quite difficult ego, but since Courier
mainly works, you don't have to flame him too often.

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber          |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Karlsruhe, Germany  |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
Nordisch by Nature  | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to