On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 10:13, Jean-Marc V. Liotier wrote: > (Re: *****SPAM***** (XXXX)XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX...) > > According to these headers contained in the message received from the > list, SpamAssassin has correctly tagged it as Spam. So why was it > forwarded anyway?
Because it might not be spam, but only a false hit ?? Because blocking mail by the list could be considered some kind of sensorship ?? BTW, because you used multiple X's in 3 different words, your mail also scored 1.896 points for 'Uses words and phrases which indicate porn (3)'. This is not very much (and is compensated by using a In-Reply-To: header worth -5.029 points, so I did receive your message, but you get the idea :) I use spamassassin on my home and work mailservers (when I receive this message back from the mailinglist I know it has been checked 4 times by various spamassassins) and I really like it, but even spamassassin is not perfect enough to use it to really block mail. -- Tot ziens, Bart-Jan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]