On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:04:19PM +0200, Marcin Sochacki wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 08:33:53AM -0500, Steve Suehring wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 01:00:33PM +0300, Sami Haahtinen wrote: > > > analog > > > The only one that doesn't have packaging or application bugs, but then > > > again, it lacks behind on features. > > > > Can you elaborate on the features that analog is missing? > > I'm not the original poster, but AFAIK Analog lacks an important feature > i.e. incremental processing.
This is one of the features missing (the most important one) > Replying to Sami: I think you've underestimated Webalizer's abilities. > Sure, it's a bit old and the development seems to have stopped, > but nevertheless it's a good program. I have no problems with Ignore > statements. I really don't understand your point about indexes -- > can you elaborate on that? the index page fog example broke at some point, i've been lazy and i haven't worked though the actual bug on it. (it's not the only reason why i'm not satisfied with webalizer though) > Also, there is a very nice project based on Webalizer, which you didn't > mention in your original post, namely Modlogan. I have fine-tuned my > Webalizer setup for quite a long time now, so I'm unwilling to switch > to another program, but if I had to choose, I would go for Modlogan. Ooh, very nice.. This looks a bit more like it. Now, lets see of this behaves better with my virtualhosts. Thanks, Sami -- -< Sami Haahtinen >- -[ Notify immediately if you do not receive this message ]- -< 2209 3C53 D0FB 041C F7B1 F908 A9B6 F730 B83D 761C >- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]