On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 at 11:08:35 -0500, Fraser Campbell wrote: > > We've had some experience with amavis over the last few years and while it > generally works it has an a tendency to lose the occassional message or just > continually requeue messages until their queue time expires and the message > bounces. We're using amavisd-postfix. > > I know there are also other variants of amavis such as amavis-ng that we could > try. Has anyone compared amavis to mailscanner and come to a definite > conclusion as to one being better. I know better is very subjective but I'd > still like to hear opinions. > > I'd like to eventually hook spam trapping into the filter (I think amavis-ng > does that) as well.
I have never used Mailscanner so I can't compare them. I use Postfix with Amavisd-new (note "d-new") and I'm very glad. As a plus, it cooperates with antivirus scanners and with Spamassassin. -- Tomasz Papszun SysAdm @ TP S.A. Lodz, Poland | And it's only [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lodz.tpsa.pl/ | ones and zeros. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ClamAV.net/ A GPL virus scanner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
