On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, Chris Wagner wrote: >Ok, ok, I'm late as hell but I had to reply. :) You don't need SCSI unless >you're doing something fancy or insane. Giving Apache more RAM is *vastly* >better than giving it SCSI. The RAM lets you cache everything so the hard >disk becomes not very important for I/O. Max out your motherboard's RAM >capacity.
One thing to consider is the amount of load. 300 domains * 300 visits / 86400 seconds in a day = 1.03 visits per second. For such a small load I doubt that you'll need much IO, memory, or CPU, unless it's all CGI-BIN stuff. Russell Coker > > >At 10:18 AM 6/13/00 +0200, Roger Abrahamsson wrote: >>On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, [ Francho ] wrote: >> >>> I have mount a new Internet Server whith (apache, mysql, bind and qmail). >It will be about 300 domains allocated (each domain will recibed about 300 >visits/day). >>> >>> What hardware do you recommend ??? >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> -- >>> <<< [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> --- >>> >> >>SCSI!! I/O is your main concern.. Then lots of memory.. CPU comes only as >>the third factor. >> >> >>------------------------------------------------- >>Roger Abrahamsson, Senior Sys/Net Admin >>Obbit AB >>Radhusespl.17D, S-90328 Umea, Sweden >>Phone: (+46)(0)90 133310 Fax:(+46)(0)90 133370 >>------------------------------------------------- >> >> >>-- >>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > >+-------------------------------------------------------------------+ >| -=I T ' S P R I N C I P L E T H A T C O U N T S=- | >|=- -=ALAN KEYES FOR PRESIDENT=- -=| >| Balanced Budgets Personal Freedoms Morality Lower Tax | >|=-- http://www.Keyes2000.com. --=| >+———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————+ > >00000100 > > >-- >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- My current location - X marks the spot. X X X