[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donovan Baarda) writes: > Though I use uw-imapd instead of Courier. The general consensus is Courier > is better, but I went with uw-imapd because it was "lighter", and I had > legacy non-Maildir mailboxes. > > Courier is nearly 1MB installed including ssl and support packages, compared > to 350K for uw-imapd-ssl. Courier uses a seperate authdaemon and > serverdaemon, whereas uw-imapd uses the normal inetd. Courier looked like > overkill for my system.
But how big are UW's c-client library files? I'm pretty sure that, including the protocol libraries, uw-imap ends up being larger than courier. -- Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>