[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donovan Baarda) writes:

> Though I use uw-imapd instead of Courier. The general consensus is Courier
> is better, but I went with uw-imapd because it was "lighter", and I had
> legacy non-Maildir mailboxes.
>
> Courier is nearly 1MB installed including ssl and support packages, compared
> to 350K for uw-imapd-ssl. Courier uses a seperate authdaemon and
> serverdaemon, whereas uw-imapd uses the normal inetd. Courier looked like
> overkill for my system.

But how big are UW's c-client library files?  I'm pretty sure that,
including the protocol libraries, uw-imap ends up being larger than
courier.

-- 
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Reply via email to