On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Craig Sanders wrote: > FYI, doesn't look like the memory leaks have been fixed: > > # ps v -Cnamed > PID TTY STAT TIME MAJFL TRS DRS RSS %MEM COMMAND > 6799 ? S 0:00 111 232 336175 200968 39.1 /usr/sbin/named -u bind > 6801 ? S 0:00 0 232 336175 200968 39.1 /usr/sbin/named -u bind > 6802 ? S 466:10 2757 232 336175 200968 39.1 /usr/sbin/named -u bind > 6803 ? S 0:04 1 232 336175 200968 39.1 /usr/sbin/named -u bind > 6804 ? R 49:56 1 232 336175 200968 39.1 /usr/sbin/named -u bind > > > this is on a machine where bind 8 used to use about 150MB. bind 9 has been > running for only 4 days.
What did that "ps v -Cnamed" show on the earlier and later days? Jeremy C. Reed ................................................... BSD software, documentation, resources, news... http://bsd.reedmedia.net/