On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 10:24:32PM +0200, Markus Welsch wrote: > > I've been using djbdns for a few years now, and I'm not aware of any > > interoperability/compatibility problems between it and BIND. I've been > > perfectly happy with djbdns. > > Would you mind mentioning a bit about the extense of use like number of > domains, etc and very interesting would also be the resource usage > anything strange you have came accross so far, etc ...
I use tinydns for a company that serves over one billion web hits per day (not visitors, hits, and no I'm not exaggerating). The authoritative nameservers serve between 100 and 300 queries/sec on each of five nameservers, for between 50 and 90 million queries answered per day. I'd use tinydns first, then probably nsd, then something else before BIND (maybe powerDNS). I know BIND better than most people, I did a technical review for the "DNS & BIND Coobook" at the request of Cricket Liu, and I still don't use it anywhere I'm not forced to. -- Nate Campi http://www.campin.net