El sáb, 28-02-2004 a las 18:51, Adam ENDRODI escribió: > On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 01:00:09AM +0100, Kilian Krause wrote: > > > > I came accross the idea of using CODA for replication of the filesys > > even though the slow network connection, but somewhat i doubt it'll be > > performant over internet. Especially more performant than plain IMAP > > replication. Anybody having numbers on these ones? > > I guess you don't want to sync at the file system level. Coda > won't be an easy battle and is generally agreed not to be > suitable for real-time applications (read: bloody slow). > Moreover, apart from the rumours, wou'd definitely need > to complicate the architect with another layer--some kind > of encrypting tunnel.
DRBD ... this is what i use, and it works fine. It is very bandwith sensitive though. > > just my gut feelings, > adam > > -- > Am I a cleric? | 1024D/37B8D989 > Or maybe a sinner? | 954B 998A E5F5 BA2A 3622 > Unbeliever? | 82DD 54C2 843D 37B8 D989 > Renegade? | http://sks.dnsalias.net >