Pascal, Had the same problem with SpamAssassin. Came up with a work-around if you want to put some time in it. I use IMAP and have separate folders for each correspondent. I then have procmail run through a series of filters for these correspondents and shove matching e-mail into the folder. Three benefits:
1) I don't lose e-mail from people just because they use outlook 2) spamassassin uses some processing power, so I am only running it against unknown senders 3) my e-mail is all nicely organized when I open SquirrelMail disadvantages: 1) occasionally spam gets through into these boxes because my regex's are less than perfect 2) I have to maintain the list overall, I like it. Rod > Pascal Hakim wrote: > > >> We are running spam assassin plus a whole bunch of custom procmail, as >> well as something called cross-assassin which gets cross posts against >> lists. >> >> For those wondering about the numbers, as far as this month is >> concerned, 376 messages (3.3 Mb) did not make it onto the list. This >> includes 207 emails stopped by cross assassin, and 90 stopped by spam >> assassin. > > Maybe the SpamCopURI plugin can help even more: http://www.surbl.org/ > > I will look into setting up SpamAssassin myself again. After it trashed > e-mails from my girlfriend I stopped using it two years ago and went to > RBL only which works good enough for me. > > Richard > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- A computer without Microsoft is like ice cream without ketchup.