Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Our Java 2 packages use a extension directory /usr/lib/j2re1.3/ext (and > /usr/lib/j2re1.3/$(ARCH)/lib). The packages for Java3D, JAI and JMF > install into those directories. > > Additionally we add /usr/share/java/repository to CLASSPATH but in > general I would prefer a strictly extension directory based approach. > It would be quite easy to add a support for a second extension > directory. You could make /usr/lib/j2re1.3/ext and /usr/lib/j2re1.3/$(ARCH)/lib be symlinks to /usr/share/java and /usr/lib/java respectively (or whatever becomes the policy). It is seems better to have a single extensions directory (pair), rather than two. -- --Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bothner.com/~per/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes Aaron Brashears
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes Aaron Brashears
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes Aaron Brashears
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes Matt Zimmerman
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes per
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes Juergen Kreileder
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes Joe Emenaker
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes Aaron Brashears
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes Cris J. Holdorph
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes per
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes Juergen Kreileder
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes Joe Emenaker
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes Seth Arnold
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes Joe Emenaker
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes Nic Ferrier
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes Joe Emenaker
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes Nic Ferrier
- Java Web Start Christopher Cobb
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes Aaron Brashears
- Re: packaging jars vs. classes Nic Ferrier