Seth Arnold wrote:
> * Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010302 01:10]:
>
>>> Artur, the problem is very simple. I hope I can explain it simply enoug
>>> Debian is about Free Software. Free as in BSD, GPL, LGPL, Artistic,
>>> XFree86, etc. All these licenses satisfy the requirements of the Debian
>>
>> What about non-free? What about real-player? Netscape and others?
>
>
> non-free is not part of Debian. realplayer comes only as an installer.
For me it`s :). It`s listed in installer. Mirorred on your sites.
Packaged in .deb.
> Netscape is there by virtue of being *the* web browser. I would imagine
> its days are numbered. (As konqueror, mozilla, and more improve
> drastically every day..)
Yeah, mozilla is really, really close. Btw. mozilla gui isn`t
customizable? Funny.
Anyway, there is a way to put java2 in debian (ok, in non-free) as
installer. However i don`t like realplayer installer. Instead i see
a installer that fetch archive (like in xanim modules), before this
displaying licensee and using sun webpages, just with different dislplay
method. I hope that it will don`t break Your laws. Could it go into
non-free?
Another question what about packages that will depends on it? Where it
should go? Contrib sounds resonable.
slu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
