On Thu, 15 Mar 2001 17:38:11 EAT
Alan KF LAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You are being deliberately provocative. Of course one can build a
> > serious application without java.security. One can even build a
> > secure application without it, though java.security gives you better
> > control. A compiler, a word-processor, an editor, or any single-user
> > application should not to deal with security concerns.
> I almost miss your last sentance. It seems you are agreeing with me
> rather. The serious applications I mean is something more on the line of
> accessing corporate database, distribute processing and at least
> embedded Java beans for scalable programs development.
>
> A word-processor, an editor...of java....man you beat me! XD
There's more to life than e-business, Alan. That might seem hard to believe to dot-com
jockeys like yourself, but... :)
> Alan.
Regards,
Alex.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]