Re: Java libraries and proposal.

[Joe Emenaker]

> 
> 
> Joe> Well, to me, "share" means share, which the jvm-specific libs
> Joe> aren't meant for.
> 
> FYI, traditionally `share' has actually meant
> `architecture-independent'.

Fair enough. Since I only go into /usr/share/java and /usr/share/doc, I 
had come to view it as the place where architecture-independent and 
*application*-independent files reside. After all, lots of different 
apps can make use of the stuff in /usr/share/java and /usr/share/doc.

Does the GNU definition say that the arch-independent stuff "must" or 
"should" go there, or do they just say that it "can"? Is 
/usr/lib/appname just as legal for the stuff that's arch-independent or 
is it discouraged?

- Joe


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]