> Well we have both ways in debian now. Should we allow both but prefer > one? Seeing as we're moving to enforce a single consistent standard, I'm personally happier if we only allow one. Looking through what the approximate list of all available java packages (see first post to this thread) I find: libservlet2.2-java libxalan2-java but nothing of the form libname-version-java or lib-name-version-java. In what sense do you mean we have both ways in debian now? I supsect I'm not looking in the right places here. Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Large-scale java policy violations Ben Burton
- Re: Large-scale java policy violations Egon Willighagen
- Re: Large-scale java policy violations Adam Heath
- Re: Large-scale java policy violations Ben Burton
- Re: Large-scale java policy violations Ola Lundqvist
- Re: Large-scale java policy violations Ben Burton
- Re: Large-scale java policy violations Ola Lundqvist
- Re: Large-scale java policy violations Ben Burton
- Re: Large-scale java policy violations Ola Lundqvist
- Re: Large-scale java policy violations Egon Willighagen
- Re: Large-scale java policy violations Ola Lundqvist
- Re: Large-scale java policy violations Stefan Gybas
- Re: Large-scale java policy violations Ola Lundqvist
- Re: Large-scale java policy violations Ben Burton
- Re: Large-scale java policy violations Stefan Gybas
- Re: Large-scale java policy violations Per Bothner
- Re: Large-scale java policy violations Adam Heath
- Re: Large-scale java policy violations Ola Lundqvist