> > http://www.kaffe.org/cgi-bin/kaffe/security?user=guest;addsignature=1 > > I think the trick is, implementing java.security takes manpower. Kaffe > has only so many developers. They have put their developers into what > they think matters the most at the moment. If you want to help, I bet > they would be happy to have your help implementing java.security. :)
As a Java programmer I seriously suspect any one could build a commercial-level(in-house, transaction-based, etc.) java application without java.security. My question is, Kaffe is funded by Microsoft(see my links in previous mail). Who is determining such a low priority in implementing a feature so important? - The funder Microsoft? Or the developers deliberately cripple Java to a toy-programming language? I wouldn't believe the developers would like to see Kaffe become a toy. My apology for being surjective but it's very suspicious. Alan