On Wednesday 30 May 2001 21:14, Andrew Pimlott wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 09:08:03PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote: > > On Wednesday 30 May 2001 20:48, Andrew Pimlott wrote: > > > It is fine to split packages into the official API classes, and > > > supporting classes. However, it is not fine to say that there can > > > be only one "official API classes" package for a given spec (eg, DOM > > > Level 1). > > > > I agree. But the interface classes should in all cases be exactly the > > same... > > Perhaps I am naive, but I don't see why. The API's of these classes > should always be the same, but different implementations _of the API > classes_ are possible.
It is wording... i guess we mean the same thing. For me an interface class is like: public interface CDOInterface { } Though it is not a "public class CDOInterface" it gives a .class file... Egon