Steve Langasek writes: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 01:23:17PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Steve Langasek writes: > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 01:18:35AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > Please consider moving the following packages to testing: > > > > > gcj-4.1 > > > > I'm wondering whether the build-dependencies of gcj-4.1 are really > > > accurate. > > > Is it really the case that gcj-4.1 will build against any version of > > > gcc-4.1-source between 4.1.1 and 4.1.2? How is this done, when the > > > gcc-4.1 > > > source package appears to incorporate various updates from svn into the > > > actual tarball being distributed? Doesn't this imply that gcj-4.1 and > > > gcc-4.1 will need to be updated in lockstep? > > > no, only the upstream tarball is used from gcc-4.1-source. the > > patches are used from the gcj-4.1 source. The patches in > > gcc-4.1-source are needed to build cross compilers, based on > > gcc-4.1-source. > > My point was that the upstream tarball shipped within the gcc-4.1 source > package differs between 4.1.1-13 and 4.1.1-19, and according to the > changelog appears to incorporate additional changes from upstream svn. Have > I misunderstood?
the upstream tarball has the same code, just some more GFDL'ed files removed. changes from upstream svn are included as a diff. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]