Matthew Johnson writes: > On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > >>> libswt-gtk-3.2-java32 > >>> libswt-gtk-3.2-java64 > >>> libswt-gtk-3.2-java > >>> > >>> Any other suggestions, or completely different approaches? > > This seems like a really bad solution. > > > The package is architecture independent except for the > > register/address size. > > How come it depends on this and is not architecture-dependent in > another way? this seems really strange. If it's all bytecode there > should be no dependency, and if there are native libraries it > surely needs to be arch-dependent for other things.
It is all bytecode. There is a wordlength dependency because the shortest Java integer type that will fit an address is used. Andrew. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
