Hi, Michael Koch said: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:32:46AM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote: >> - the Java Policy should state that a Java package should depend on >> java2-runtime only if the packager expects its program to work with a >> classpath-alike implementation of Java. >> (what about IcedTea then?) > > IMO all java packages should depend on java2-runtime as second > alternative and bugs should be filed against runtimes not working > properly with a package. Oookay... Looks like we're doing circles here. How do we progress now? I'm fine with both options, but I feel that we need a consensus within debian-java, and that we don't have it yet.
> >> - in the words of Michael: >> Michael Koch said: >> > The X packages should only be in Recommends and its possible to not >> > install Recommends (but you are expected you are knowing what you are >> > doing). >> >> Can we get an agreement on those points? > > Thats already fact. Do we need our own consensus in Debian Java? No, fine with me, I've closed my "serious" bug on this basis :-) Thanks, Eric -- You don't need to CC me on debian-java, debian-mentors and pkg-java-maintainers. Please CC me on other Debian lists. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]