Thomas Viehmann schrieb: > Hi, > > I'm afraid that openjdk-6 still needs some work:
thanks for looking into this. after the second try to upload and 10 days in the NEW queue the review is a bit terse. > Up to now I found: > - The debian/copyright file seems to miss a lot of > copyright notices (e.g. of Red Hat, Maxwell, ASF, > I stopped after finding four). This is the main > reject reason. it would be helpful if you could mention those. it would be appreciated if you could act proactively. > - There are some files in the generated subdir that > I'm not sure I found the source of. Could you > clarify this a bit for me? which files? Sorry, I really dislike rejecting a package for clarification reasons. You can ask if you are unsure. > - usr-share-doc-symlink-without-dependency > is an explicit policy violation and not allowed. please be specific. or this lintian not detecting indirect dependencies? > While you're doing stuff, you could also get rid of > - substvar-source-version-is-deprecated thanks for the hint, but this doesn't belong into a reject message. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]